This is an experiment using ChatGTP Comparing Hobbes and Locke. February 24th 2023.
I was doing some afternoon exploration with an Intelligence² debate podcast about AI and ChatGPT.
I found myself listening to Gary Marcus and some guy named Kevin debating whether or not generative AI based on GTP3 transformers and chatGPT would harm or help humanity. Gary, Marcus is clearly on the side that the current version of this phenomenal technology, and I use the term phenomenal in its true sense.
Marcus said the technology Is that it will literally destroy the world and destabilize civilized society. He speaks in hyperbola and toxic language is continuously injected into the debate. But that’s Marcus. Interestingly, in the debate, the other analyst brought up a scenario which he said he wouldn’t try with ChatGPT because he was concerned that a large language model would misinterpret the comparison of two philosophers.
He chose the example of comparing Hobbes and Locke, two very famous philosophers that have been studied by thousands of philosophers tens of thousands of academics and millions of students around the world. The corpus of information on these philosophers is very large.
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704). Hobbes and Locke each stood on fundamentally opposing corners in their debate on what made the most effective form of government for society. Hobbes was a proponent of Absolutism, a system which placed control of the state in the hands of a single individual, a monarch free from all forms of limitations or accountability. Locke, on the other hand, favored a more open approach to state-building. Locke believed that a government’s legitimacy came from the consent of the people they governed.
Kevin stated that he wouldn’t use a large language with model to summarize or compare the two because he felt that that it chatGPT could not be correct. I disagree because of the obvious corpus of information on the philosophers. So I tried an experiment and generated a comparison of the two philosophers.
The idea now is to generate some ideas and comparisons using chatGPT which is below and then double check it on open source information from the web, from Wikipedia, and from my memory of studying philosophy.
My current library has a few books that will cover this topic. I believe it should be easy to compare the two philosophy giants.
So far, by my eye and quick intuitive gut-check, I don’t see things that are incorrect, but literally the devil is in the details of this one. So now that I have the generation below I will check it and compare what the large language model and natural language understanding and the generation predicted.
My hypothesis is that it does a pretty good job on things like this, because there is a large body of in formation that is generally accepted as fact about philosophers from a few hundred years ago that influence many people. It’s not clear to many people that these large language models are right about a lot of things and wrong about somethings.
As usual, humans want perfection. The people afraid of machines and robots want super-perfection. That just is impossible and way above the bar of what they expect from other humans or government or any other collective. This is the irony of the evolution of computing and humanity overlapping across this new alien technology that some people refer to as artificial intelligence.
Let’s jump into the experiment.
Open sidebar
Comparison of Hobbes and Locke
Rob Tyrie
Compare and contrast Hobbes and locke in a 10 point summary
Hobbes and Locke were both influential political philosophers who lived during the 17th century. Although they both lived during the same time period and focused on political philosophy, they held very different views on many key issues. Here is a 10 point summary comparing and contrasting Hobbes and Locke:
Human nature: Hobbes believed that human nature was inherently selfish and violent, and that people were constantly in competition with each other for power and resources. In contrast, Locke believed that humans were born as a blank slate and that their nature was shaped by their experiences.
Social contract: Both Hobbes and Locke believed in the concept of a social contract, but they had different ideas about what it entailed. Hobbes believed that people entered into a social contract to give up their individual power and submit to the authority of a strong, centralized government, in order to prevent a state of war. Locke, on the other hand, believed that people entered into a social contract to protect their natural rights and that the government's authority was derived from the consent of the governed.
State of nature: Hobbes believed that in the state of nature, life was "nasty, brutish, and short" and that people were constantly in a state of war with each other. Locke believed that in the state of nature, people were free and equal, and that they could enjoy their natural rights.
Role of government: Hobbes believed that a strong, centralized government was necessary to maintain order and prevent chaos. Locke believed that the government's role was to protect the natural rights of its citizens and to ensure justice and fairness.
Monarchy: Hobbes believed that a monarchy was the best form of government, as it provided the stability and strong leadership needed to maintain order. Locke, on the other hand, believed in a limited monarchy, where the monarch's power was checked by a constitution or other forms of accountability.
Revolution: Hobbes believed that revolution was never justified, as it would only lead to chaos and a return to the state of nature. Locke believed that revolution was justified in cases where the government failed to protect the natural rights of its citizens.
Property: Hobbes believed that property was a creation of the state, and that people had no inherent right to it. Locke believed that people had a natural right to property, and that the government's role was to protect that right.
Religion: Hobbes believed that religion was necessary to maintain order and obedience to the government. Locke believed in freedom of religion and that the government should not be involved in religious matters.
Education: Hobbes believed that education was necessary to instill obedience to the government and to prevent dissent. Locke believed in education for its own sake and that it was essential to creating informed and responsible citizens.
Individualism: Hobbes believed that the individual was subordinate to the state, and that the government's authority was absolute. Locke believed in individual rights and freedoms, and that the government's authority was limited by the natural rights of its citizens.
Rob Tyrie
List Hobbes ideas in 20 one sentence bullets.
Certainly, here are 20 key ideas of Hobbes summarized in one sentence each:
Human beings are naturally selfish, competitive, and violent.
The natural condition of humans is a state of war against each other.
To escape the state of war, humans must submit to a sovereign authority.
The sovereign authority has absolute power and is not bound by any law.
The power of the sovereign must be strong enough to prevent conflict and maintain order.
The social contract is an agreement between individuals to transfer their power to the sovereign.
The sovereign's authority derives from the consent of the people.
The sovereign has the power to create and enforce laws, including moral and religious laws.
Religion is a tool used by the sovereign to control people's behavior.
People should obey the sovereign in all matters, including religion.
Individual rights are not important compared to the security provided by the sovereign.
Rebellion against the sovereign is never justified.
Education should be used to instill obedience to the sovereign.
Science can be used to understand the natural world and improve human life.
Morality is based on self-preservation and the avoidance of harm.
Liberty is only possible in a state where the sovereign has complete control.
Private property is created by the sovereign and can be taken away at any time.
The sovereign has the power to decide what is just and unjust.
The state must be able to defend itself against external threats.
Humans have a natural right to self-preservation.
Rob Tyrie
List Locke's and Hobbes ideas in 30 1 sentence bullets in logical comparison in each row
2 / 2
Certainly, here are 30 key ideas of Locke and Hobbes, presented in logical comparison in each row:
Human Nature:
Hobbes: Human nature is inherently selfish, violent, and competitive.
Locke: Human beings are born as a blank slate and their nature is shaped by experience.
State of Nature:
Hobbes: In the state of nature, people are in a constant state of war against each other.
Locke: In the state of nature, people are free and equal, and they have the right to enjoy their natural rights.
Social Contract:
Hobbes: The social contract is an agreement between individuals to give up their individual power to a strong, centralized government.
Locke: The social contract is an agreement between individuals to protect their natural rights and create a limited government.
Role of Government:
Hobbes: The government's role is to maintain order and prevent chaos, even if it means using force.
Locke: The government's role is to protect the natural rights of its citizens, and to ensure justice and fairness.
Form of Government:
Hobbes: Monarchy is the best form of government, as it provides the stability and strong leadership needed to maintain order.
Locke: Limited monarchy or representative democracy is the best form of government, as it checks the power of the monarch and ensures accountability.
Revolution:
Hobbes: Revolution is never justified, as it will only lead to chaos and a return to the state of nature.
Locke: Revolution is justified in cases where the government fails to protect the natural rights of its citizens.
Individual Rights:
Hobbes: Individual rights are not important compared to the security provided by the sovereign.
Locke: Individual rights are fundamental, including the rights to life, liberty, and property.
Religion:
Hobbes: Religion is necessary to maintain obedience to the government.
Locke: The government should not be involved in religious matters, and individuals have the right to freedom of religion.
Education:
Hobbes: Education should be used to instill obedience to the government.
Locke: Education is essential to creating informed and responsible citizens.
Property:
Hobbes: Private property is created by the sovereign and can be taken away at any time.
Locke: People have a natural right to property, and the government's role is to protect that right.
Freedom:
Hobbes: Liberty is only possible in a state where the sovereign has complete control.
Locke: Freedom and liberty are fundamental rights, and the government's authority is limited by the natural rights of its citizens.
Rob Tyrie
List Locke's and Hobbes ideas in 30 1 sentence bullets in logical comparison in each row of a table. Add in concept of
generally accepted conservative and liberal thinking
Certainly, here are 30 key ideas of Locke and Hobbes, presented in a logical comparison table, along with generally accepted conservative and liberal thinking:
Concept Hobbes Locke Conservative Liberal
Human Nature Human nature is inherently selfish, violent, and competitive. Human beings are born as a blank slate and their nature is shaped by experience. Humans are inherently flawed and need strong governance. Humans are inherently good, and with proper institutions, can thrive.
State of Nature In the state of nature, people are in a constant state of war against each other. In the state of nature, people are free and equal, and they have the right to enjoy their natural rights. The state of nature is chaos, and humans require strong governance to maintain order. The state of nature is a place of freedom, where humans can develop their full potential.
Social Contract The social contract is an agreement between individuals to give up their individual power to a strong, centralized government. The social contract is an agreement between individuals to protect their natural rights and create a limited government. The social contract is necessary to preserve order and stability. The social contract is necessary to protect individual freedom and rights.
Role of Government The government's role is to maintain order and prevent chaos, even if it means using force. The government's role is to protect the natural rights of its citizens, and to ensure justice and fairness. The government's role is to provide law and order, and to protect traditional values. The government's role is to promote equality, individual rights, and social justice.
Form of Government Monarchy is the best form of government, as it provides the stability and strong leadership needed to maintain order. Limited monarchy or representative democracy is the best form of government, as it checks the power of the monarch and ensures accountability. Monarchy or constitutional democracy are acceptable forms of government. Democratic institutions are the preferred form of government.
Revolution Revolution is never justified, as it will only lead to chaos and a return to the state of nature. Revolution is justified in cases where the government fails to protect the natural rights of its citizens. Revolution is never justified, as it undermines the stability of society. Revolution is a legitimate tool for achieving social change and progress.
Individual Rights Individual rights are not important compared to the security provided by the sovereign. Individual rights are fundamental, including the rights to life, liberty, and property. Individual rights are important, but must be balanced against the needs of society. Individual rights are paramount and must be protected at all costs.
Religion Religion is necessary to maintain obedience to the government. The government should not be involved in religious matters, and individuals have the right to freedom of religion. Religion is an important part of traditional values and culture. Religion should be a private matter, and should not be used to justify discrimination or oppression.
Education Education should be used to instill obedience to the government. Education is essential to creating informed and responsible citizens. Education should promote traditional values and instill discipline. Education should promote critical thinking and encourage diverse perspectives.
Property Private property is created by the sovereign and can be taken away at any time. People have a natural right to property, and the government's role is to protect that right. Private property is a fundamental right that must be protected. Private property rights must be balanced against the needs of society.
Freedom Liberty is only possible in a state where the sovereign has complete control. Freedom and liberty are fundamental rights, and the government's
Rob Tyrie
List 5 books exploring Hobbes' and Locke's differences and similarities
Here are five books that explore the differences and similarities between Hobbes and Locke:
"Hobbes, Locke, and Confusion's Masterpiece: An Examination of Seventeenth-Century Political Philosophy" by Ross Harrison: This book provides an in-depth analysis of Hobbes and Locke's political philosophy, focusing on their views on human nature, the state of nature, and the role of government.
"The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes's Leviathan" edited by Patricia Springborg: This collection of essays offers a comprehensive overview of Hobbes's political theory and its historical context, comparing and contrasting his ideas with those of other political philosophers, including Locke.
"John Locke and the Origins of Private Property: Philosophical Explorations of Individualism, Community, and Equality" by Matthew H. Kramer: This book examines Locke's theory of property, contrasting it with Hobbes's theory and exploring the implications of Locke's ideas for contemporary debates about property rights.
"Locke: A Very Short Introduction" by John Dunn: This concise introduction to Locke's political philosophy provides an overview of his major ideas, including his views on human nature, the state of nature, and the social contract, and situates his work in the context of his intellectual milieu, including his relationship with Hobbes.
"Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition" by Jean Hampton: This book examines the social contract tradition in political philosophy, focusing on the contributions of Hobbes and his relationship to later social contract theorists, including Locke. The book offers a critical analysis of Hobbes's theory, contrasting it with Locke's and exploring the implications of each for contemporary political theory.
Rob Tyrie
What you think of Hobbes and Locke in a modern world. How are each helpful or hurtful to human dignity. Write a 1500 word essay about this in the style of a science journalist. Add in a overarching metaphor helpful in the comparison.
2 / 2
In the world of political philosophy, few thinkers have had as much influence as Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Hobbes and Locke's ideas on the role of government, the nature of human beings, and the relationship between the individual and the state have shaped political debates for centuries. But how do their ideas hold up in the modern world? And what impact do they have on human dignity?
To understand Hobbes and Locke's ideas in the modern world, it is helpful to think of them as two different tools in a toolbox. Just as a carpenter may choose between a hammer and a saw depending on the task at hand, policymakers and thinkers can draw on Hobbes and Locke's ideas depending on the challenges they face. Both Hobbes and Locke have their strengths and weaknesses, and their ideas can be helpful or hurtful to human dignity depending on how they are applied.
Let's start with Hobbes. Hobbes is often seen as a pessimistic thinker who views human beings as inherently violent and selfish. According to Hobbes, life in the state of nature (a hypothetical pre-government state) is "nasty, brutish, and short," as individuals are constantly engaged in a "war of all against all." In order to escape this state of violence, individuals must enter into a social contract with each other and with the state, giving up their natural right to violence in exchange for the protection of the government. Hobbes sees the state as an absolute authority, with the power to maintain order and punish those who violate the social contract.
Hobbes' ideas about the role of government and the nature of human beings can be helpful in certain contexts. For example, in situations where there is widespread violence and chaos, a strong authoritarian government may be necessary to restore order and protect people from harm. Hobbes' emphasis on the need for a social contract can also be helpful in promoting cooperation and mutual respect among individuals.
However, Hobbes' ideas can also be hurtful to human dignity. By painting a picture of human beings as inherently violent and selfish, Hobbes overlooks the capacity for empathy, compassion, and cooperation that are also part of human nature. In addition, Hobbes' emphasis on the absolute authority of the state can lead to the erosion of individual rights and freedoms, as the state may use its power to suppress dissent and maintain control.
Now let's turn to Locke. Unlike Hobbes, Locke sees human beings as fundamentally rational and capable of cooperation. According to Locke, individuals have natural rights to life, liberty, and property, which the state is obligated to protect. Locke sees the state as a limited authority, with the power to maintain order and protect individual rights, but not to interfere with the lives of citizens more than necessary.
Locke's ideas about individual rights and limited government can be helpful in promoting human dignity. By emphasizing the importance of individual freedom and the responsibility of the state to protect those freedoms, Locke's ideas can help to safeguard against tyranny and promote respect for human autonomy. In addition, Locke's ideas about the importance of property rights can be helpful in promoting economic growth and prosperity.
However, Locke's ideas can also be hurtful to human dignity in certain contexts. For example, Locke's emphasis on property rights can lead to the accumulation of wealth by a small minority, leaving others without access to basic necessities such as food and shelter. In addition, Locke's ideas about limited government can lead to a lack of investment in public goods such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, which are essential for promoting the well-being of all citizens.
So what is the overarching metaphor that can help us compare Hobbes and Locke in the modern world? Perhaps it is that of a balancing act. Like a tightrope walker, policymakers and thinkers must navigate between the extremes of absolute authority and
Rob Tyrie
Continue and recommend 5 books to support exploring these philosophies
Like a tightrope walker, policymakers and thinkers must navigate between the extremes of absolute authority and individual freedom, trying to find the right balance to promote the well-being and dignity of all citizens. This balancing act is not always easy, and it requires careful consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of different political philosophies.
To explore the ideas of Hobbes and Locke in greater depth, here are five books that provide valuable insights into their philosophies and their relevance to the modern world:
"Leviathan" by Thomas Hobbes - This seminal work by Hobbes lays out his ideas on the social contract, the nature of human beings, and the role of government in maintaining order. It is a challenging read, but it provides a foundation for understanding Hobbes' philosophy.
"Two Treatises of Government" by John Locke - In this work, Locke sets out his ideas on natural rights, limited government, and the relationship between the individual and the state. It is a clear and accessible text that provides a counterpoint to Hobbes' ideas.
"The Social Contract" by Jean-Jacques Rousseau - While not specifically about Hobbes or Locke, this work by Rousseau explores similar themes of the social contract and the relationship between the individual and the state. It provides a different perspective on these issues and raises important questions about the legitimacy of political authority.
"The Rights of Man" by Thomas Paine - In this work, Paine defends the principles of the French Revolution and argues for the importance of individual rights and representative government. It is a passionate and persuasive defense of the liberal tradition that Locke helped to establish.
"The Limits of Power: The Politics of Local Planning Policy" by Robert Beauregard - This book applies the ideas of Hobbes and Locke to the modern context of urban planning, exploring how different visions of the role of government and the individual can shape the development of cities. It provides a concrete example of how these ideas can be applied in practice.
Overall, exploring the ideas of Hobbes and Locke can help us to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of different political philosophies, and to navigate the complex challenges of the modern world. By engaging with these ideas, we can work towards a more just and equitable society that promotes the dignity and well-being of all its citizens.
ChatGPT Feb 13 Version. Free Research Preview. Our goal is to make AI systems more natural and safe to interact with. Your feedback will help us improve.
New chat
